Back to Blog
H gate quantum calculator6/3/2023 The result of the team’s experiments showed that the spin-flipping times approached near 1 nanosecond - setting a new record for a single-spin qubit and bringing the clock speed closer to what one might expect from a conventional computer. Moreover, compared to ordinary bits these “holes” can be better coupled to electric fields, or selectively coupled to other spins by tuning to a resonant frequency. The removal of this negatively charged electron from the germanium and silicon semiconductor results in a “hole”, as well as an overall positive charge - a “spin.” This so-called “hole spin” forms the basis for the team’s switchable qubit, which can then be changed from a slow to fast state by applying an electrical charge, as well as having the ability to adopt both an “up” and “down” state. Here’s a new kind of qubit that can be switched between two modes: a stable “idle” mode that’s suited for storing information, and a fast “calculation” mode for processing data. “Qubits defined in silicon and germanium quantum dots are of particular interest for scaling up quantum circuits due to their small size, speed of operation, and compatibility with the semiconductor industry,” added the researchers. The pulses can force the qubits into either a slow mode for storing information (blue arrow) or a fast mode for calculation (red arrow). An electrical voltage can be applied to the gates, resulting in the formation of individual “spin” qubits (pictured as blue and red arrows), which can be altered by microwave signals (depicted above as the blue pulses). The nanowire lies on electrodes (gold in the above image) that function as quantum logic gates. Measuring only 20 nanometers in diameter, these nanowires are extremely thin, meaning the team’s qubit is incredibly tiny as well and therefore, could potentially mean millions (or even billions) of these switchable qubits could be someday packed onto a reasonably small integrated chip. To create this switchable qubit, the researchers first removed an electron from a semiconductor, made out of a nanowire with a germanium core (seen as orange in the image above) and wrapped in silicon (green). “A key challenge in quantum computation is the implementation of fast and local qubit control while simultaneously maintaining coherence,” noted the research team in their paper, which was published last month in Nature Nanotechnology. This new development will help qubits maintain their overall stability, as they can be more vulnerable to external perturbations compared to conventional bits, making them lose what is known as quantum coherence. Researchers from the University of Basel and TU Eindhoven have now added yet another piece to the developing quantum puzzle: a new kind of qubit that can be switched between two modes: a stable “idle” mode that’s suited for storing information, and a fast “calculation” mode for processing data. Quantum computers will likely also need to shrink down to a more practical size, and the distances between networked quantum devices will have to be extended beyond what they currently are now. For starters, future quantum computers will need some kind of auto-verification protocols, in order to ensure that their calculations are correct. Instead of the binary 1s and 0s of conventional, classical computing, the quantum bits (or “qubits”) of quantum computers can encode information in both states (also known as quantum superposition), making them much more powerful for things like data encryption, or for the next-generation machine learning systems that will underpin the healthcare, finance and research sectors.īut there are still a lot of kinks to work out in this newly emerging quantum domain. This is made possible by the fact that quantum computers run according to the seemingly bizarre laws of quantum mechanics. I want to write the matrix form of a single or two qubit gate in the tensor product vector space of a many qubit system.There’s a lot of hype around quantum computers and how they will likely surpass the current limitations of so-called “classical” computing.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |